Posts Tagged ‘revision’
This week, I’ve been deep in editing land for my novelette “Doll Seed” due to appear next month in FIYAH: Magazine of Black Speculative Fiction.
It’s always a revelation to receive editorial comments on a story. Especially a story that you’ve lived with for years, have honed substantially and have vetted through numerous writing groups. Such was the case for “Doll Seed”.
In the past few years, I’ve felt lucky to have worked with fantastic editors. Great editors reveal new perspectives in your work, encourage clarity and support your authorial voice. In the case of Reenu-You and Nussia with Book Smugglers Press, I spent time revising a few scenes where my characters were under reacting. With “Doll Seed”, I worked some on this issue, but more on clarifying how the magic works in the story and fine tuning the ending. I enjoyed editing “Doll Seed”. In revising these stories, all of which were written years ago, I see how much I’ve grown as a writer and storyteller.
One of the tools that has helped me become more proficient at self-editing has been my ‘weasel words’ list. A few years ago, I took a class on revision and the instructor introduced us to a list of words and/or phrases that weaken one’s writing. We can usually either delete the word or find a more active and vivid word to substitute. I believe she adapted this list from the one in James Scott Bell’s Revision and Self-Editing for Writers. I keep this list close when I revise. Doing a search for these words once yielded dramatic results. Last year, I was frantically trying to pare a story down to submit to an anthology and using this list I reduced the word count by over 500 words! That’s a lot of weasel words to round up!
Weasel Words to Watch Out For
Very
Almost
Just
Really
Finally
Actually
Maybe
Definitely
Certainly
A little
A lot
A bit
Tried to
Started to
Began to
Wanted to
Meant to
Intended to
Had to
Had been
I also overuse the words lively, inviting and flat in describing the expression of a character’s eyes.
Do you have a weasel words list? What are your pet phrases that you strike when revising?
Affirmations-366Days#361
Posted December 27, 2016
on:Affirmations-366Days#361: Revising a project is often like moving around pieces in a puzzle. I patiently figure out which parts make the right picture.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#300
Posted October 27, 2016
on:Affirmations-366Days#300: I constantly revise my limited notions of what’s possible of me as a writer.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#166
Posted June 15, 2016
on:Affirmations-366Days#166: Every writer goes through multiple drafts. I don’t have to start out perfect, I just have to start.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#162
Posted June 11, 2016
on:Affirmations-366Days#162: It’s better to say “it can be fixed” than “it’s bad”. I affirm that my writing project grows stronger with each revision.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#125
Posted May 5, 2016
on:- In: creative writing | creativity | writing
- 2 Comments
Affirmations-366Days#125: Revision requires skill and strategy. I am patient when revising my work. I know the best is yet to come.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#88
Posted March 29, 2016
on:Affirmations-366Days#88: I revise with ease. Thoughtful revision is the quickest way to get closer to my reader.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#69
Posted March 10, 2016
on:Affirmations-366Days#69: I honor the revision process by keeping the right words and setting the rest free for another day.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Affirmations-366Days#12 & Challenging What ‘Everyone Says’: Are You Following Bad Writing Advice?
Posted January 13, 2016
on:- In: creative writing | creativity | writing
- 3 Comments
Affirmations-366Days#12: I listen to all writing advice, but only take to heart what really works for me.
For new readers, here’s why I’m committing to writing affirmations, about the creative process, during the next 366 days.
Today’s affirmation is inspired by a panel that I was on over the weekend. I attended illogiCon, a local science fiction convention and moderated a panel called ‘Everyone Says: Bad Writing Advice’. The panelists wanted to discuss the fact that not all writing advice out there is good, or for everyone, even if it’s repeated in many books and how-to articles. I was looking forward to moderating it and it was truly a lively panel. Panelists included authors Mur Lafferty, Fraser Sherman, Josh Leone, Ada Milenkovic Brown and publisher Lynn McNamee. In preparation for this panel, I also asked friends on Facebook and Twitter to talk with me about bad writing advice. Below are some highlights from these threads of conversation:
You should start writing by making an outline.
–Many of us learned this rule in grade school. This rule tends not to work well for nonlinear thinkers and/or people who think of themselves as discovery writers, meaning writers who write their way into a story first without a strong sense of plot. Most panelists agreed, however, that at some point in a project (for a novel, say after 10,000 words), it can be helpful to step back and make an outline. One panelist also suggested doing a reverse outline where you work backwards through a completed story to see if there any gaps or plot holes. I really like this idea. I also advocate using mindmaps instead of outlines, either as part of pre-writing or when you get stuck.
Write what you know.
–Beginning writers often hear this a lot. Most people balked at this concept as limiting. One of my Facebook friends said, “…writing what you know* is stifling and, for me at least, has led to lots of insecurity about whether or not I had the authority to tell stories that come ONLY from my imagination. That said, there is a lot to be said for research.”
There was a general consensus to write about what you love and/or are interested in. The passion for what you’re writing about will lead you to find out more on a topic.
Always cut your work by 10% (or 20% or 30%).
–I have heard this point made often—always cut your work by 10% before sending it out. One panelist offered a really important observation about this rule. Absolute adherence to this rule can stifle a writer’s style. This panelist explained that for years they tried to follow this rule only to realize that it made the work less rich and complex.
Always write in the same place and at the same time.
–We all agreed that creating a sense of rhythm through writing consistently helps writers. But, an uncritical adherence to this rule is highly impractical for most writers. As an astute observer on my Facebook thread commented: […This rule can] “lead to a lot of self-recriminations …energy better spent writing whenever the hell you can and choose to…this is not a clock punching endeavor. Regular writing yes. Factory clocks only if you love them.” Capture those ideas whenever and wherever you can.
Revise until it is perfect.
–This particular rule didn’t come up on the panel, but I thought I’d offer it here. I find that many writers internalize this rule in ways that can be immobilizing. Before sending one’s work out for publication, it is important to make it as strong as possible. However, often emerging writers lose sight about what makes their work strong, and so they never think anything is good enough or revised sufficiently. I believe a work is ready to be released when you’ve made it as strong as you can, left it to sit for a period of a reasonable period of time (e.g. days, weeks or even a few months), can’t find any more structural flaws with it, and have received positive feedback from trusted readers. Release it! If it gets rejected, that’s OK. It’s part of the process.
All the panelists acknowledged this central point—don’t slavishly follow any writing rule if it doesn’t work for you! Your writing needs are unique. Definitely learn from other writers, but make your writing practice work for you.
What;s your experience with writing advice that just didn’t work for you? I’d love to know.